MLJ 249 3 CLJ 796 (bba) n Affin Bank Berhad v Zulkifli Abdullah 3 MLJ 67 7 MLJ 355 (BBA) n Tahan Steel Corporation Sdn Bhd v Bank Islam Malaysiaīerhad 6 CLJ 25 6 MLJ 1 (istisna) n Arab Malaysian Merchant Bank Berhad v Silver Concept Sdnīhd 5 MLJ 210 (BBA) n Malayan Banking Berhad v Marilyn Ho Siok Lin 7 2 MLJ 408 1 CLJ 625 (BBA) n Bank Islam Malaysia Berhad v Pasaraya Peladang Sdn Berhad The court did not look into the issue further whether BBA facility involves an element not approved by the Shariah as stipulated under the IBA and the BAFIA.Ģ003-2007 n Bank Kerjasama Rakyat Malaysia Berhad v Emcee Corporation In this respect, the court applied the classic common law interpretational approach where the parties are bound with the terms and conditions of the contract. N In the case of Bank Islam Malaysia Berhad v Adnan Omar, the High Court held that the defendant was bound to pay the whole amount of the selling price based on the grounds that he knew the terms of the contract and knowingly entered into the agreement. Observation n The judges are more concerned on the application ofĬlassic common law approach by emphasizing the civil technical aspects and did not tackle the actual Shariah issues. N Bank Kerjasama Rakyat Malaysia Bhd v Nesaretnam Samyveloo 8 CLJ 95 7 MLJ 103 (BBA) N Bank Islam Malaysia Bhd v Shamsuddin Bin Haji Ahmad 1 LNS 275 MLJ 450 (BBA) N Dato Nik Mahmud Bin Daud v Bank Islam Malaysia Berhad 4 MLJ 295 (BBA) Malay Reserve N Bank Islam Malaysia Berhad v Adnan Omar 3 CLJ 735 3 AMR 44 4 BLJ 372: BBA N Tinta Press Sdn Berhad v BIMB (1987) 1 MLJ 474 1 CLJ 474: IJarah
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |